Version User Scope of changes
Feb 22 2012, 10:57 PM EST (current) WareHistorical 612 words deleted
Feb 24 2009, 9:02 PM EST WareHistorical 399 words added

Changes

Key:  Additions   Deletions

Nenameseck Square - Ware Historical Society



















Do We Care About the Square?

Did you know that Nenameseck Square is the last vestige of Ware’s plan for a town common?

Ever wonder why every town around us has a town common and we do not?

The answer lies in a historical mystery. The year is 1844. The center of town has really changed, moving east towards the factories and leaving pastoral Ware Center for the bustle of industry. “Among the assets of the Hampshire Manufacturing Company, which failed in 1837, was a large tract of land known as the Common, lying between Main and Water Streets, extending east to the Otis Company’s Office, and west to Palmer Road.” (Chase, History of Ware, p.170) It was the intention of the company to give the tract to the town, but they neglected to do so before the company went under, so there was nothing that could be done but to sell the land. It was therefore cut into 34 building lots, all of which sold, except for a couple of lots on the east end.

These lots became Nenameseck Square, named for a method of fishing the river that flowed through the settled area. The “weir” (pronounced “ware”) was a loose structure of stones and brush that began at either side of the river and nearly met in the middle. A basket was held at the opening for the fish that inevitably ran into the trap. Nenameseck is the Nipmuc word for weir. There was a spectacular weir at the falls of the Ware River where the mills are now.

The history of the Square itself is not without controversy. According to Conkey’s History of Ware, in 1932 an investor purchasing the Otis Company laid claim to the Square as owned by the Company. Judge Henry Davis of Ware argued against that opinion, and the town affirmed its rights to Nenameseck Square. In 1905, the suggestion to move the horse trough from the north side of the common to the south side was made, but not carried out until 1955. In 1959, a plan to remove the ornamental fence, made in town by the Ware Foundry, met with local opposition and was abandoned. In 1974, the town came together once more to keep Nenameseck Square safe from the demands of traffic and change. At our most recent town meeting, this action was rescinded, and Nenameseck Square is once more in jeopardy.

Can the Square be saved or shall we obliterate it in the face of traffic demands? Nenameseck Square is listed on the National Register of Historic Places because it is one of those places we can look to that really connects our community to the past. It is a heritage landscape, a result of human interaction with the natural resources of the town. Is there a way we can make the corner safe for traffic without sacrificing an area that town’s people have kept sacred for over 150 years?
Once the town common, then a playground, and now a sweet place to sit and eat lunch, Nenameseck Square is a spot that provides beauty, shade and history all in one shot on Main Street. The Parks Department has done a tremendous job keeping the ornamental fence intact this year, as well as trimming the grounds and providing a dash of color where the planters are blooming. Even as the horse trough at the north side spills over with flowers, the trucks that pass too close to the fence pose a hazard to Ware’s “town common”. As the town looks ahead to trying to improve the traffic pattern through these now busy streets, remember that there is history in that Square. It is a small piece of open space on our Main Street, the last bit of a town common we have.
Does Ware care about the Square? I certainly hope so.

by Lynn Lak, Ware Historical Commission

Letter to the Board of Selectmen August 18, 2008 Board of SelectmenTown of Ware126 Main StreetWare, MA 01082Ladies and Gentlemen: Tonight, at its regular monthly meeting, the members of the Ware Historical Commission reviewed Mr. St. George Sorel’s Option 1 plan for restructuring Nenameseck Square and voted 3-1-0 against recommending it. While we respect Mr. St. George Sorel’s concern for public safety, our concern is for maintaining Ware’s historical assets. And protecting Nenameseck Square is one of our top concerns. We are opposed to the loss of 30’+/- of real estate, and the loss of a significant tree. We feel that there are more cost-effective solutions to the problem, especially during these hard financial times:· One solution would be to move the fence back 4-5 feet from the front of the square where fence damage always occurs. This would involve moving the concrete footings and adjusting the fence a bit, maybe taking out a section. If a truck’s tires did roll over the sidewalk and grass, then the fence would not get damaged. The tree could stay where it is.· Another option is to force car traffic turning right onto South Street to use the street next to the bank, allowing a wider lane for for trucks making a right-hand turn onto South Street, and for traffic proceeding straight ahead.

· A third option would be to move the stop line back on South Street to allow trucks turning right onto South a little more room to maneuver.
·
A fourth option is to install bollards around the front of the square so that if a truck did cut the corner, the bollards would force the truck’s tires back onto the road. The Ware Historical Commission is willing to pay for these bollards from its discretionary fund because it feels so strongly about not altering the Square.None of these options is very costly, and they could be used in conjunction with each other. Again, the Ware Historical Commission would be willing to pay for the bollards. Pedestrians would be no less safe than they are right now, and could still use the sidewalk. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on this report. We hope that we are united in trying to protect the charm and historical significance of Nenameseck Square.Very truly yours,
Lynn Lak, Chair, Ware Historic Commission